More on Four-digit Mnemonic Number Systems
I just saw that Ben Pridmore posted a blog post about his progress with a four-digit number systems:
And then there’s the continuing dilemma of the four-digit number system. I have a nagging doubt that after all the effort of creating it, it’ll turn out to be unusable and I’ll have wasted a lot of time and made myself even worse at memorising numbers than I was in the first place.
Simon Reinhard also left a comment about his four-digit system. He may be the first example of someone putting a four-digit system to use at the highest level of competition. (He holds the world record in speed cards.)
A 4-digit PA System?
One other thing I’ve been thinking about:
I wonder if a PA system could function as a four-digit system:
- 1921 - “TUHNI” - woodpecker bouncing up and down
- 1922 - “TUHNU” - woodpecker pecking an onion
- 1923 - “TUHNAA” - woodpecker walking on water
- 1924 - “TUHNA” - woodpecker on fire (like the Human Torch)
Could three 4-digit compound images then be placed into each locus?
Would it be possible to build six-digit compound images (PAO) and place 18 digits per locus? For example, could three compound images like this be placed in one locus:
- 192120 - “TUHNISO” - woodpecker bouncing up and down on a blackboard
Would it work better if it weren’t a strict PA or PAO system, but were designed so that the compound images interact with each other better?
If a two-digit PAO system could be modified into a method of placing 18 decimal digits per locus, then a three-digit PAO-type system could theoretically put 27 decimal digits in a locus with only 1,000 basic images. Using that idea with Ben’s binary system, one locus could theoretically hold 90 binary digits.
Just brainstorming out loud. :)